With a Roth IRA, the owner can make limited contributions each year. In 2025, the limit is $7,000; $8,000 if age 50 or older. Only people who earn less than $150,000 (single filers) or under $236,000 (married filing jointly) can make a full Roth IRA contribution. While contributions do not qualify for a tax deduction, earnings are not taxable once the account has been open for five years. Contributions, which were previously taxed as income, can be withdrawn at any time.
Once you open and contribute to a Roth IRA, the five-year countdown begins before you can take any earnings out tax-free. However, the holding period is actually measured from Jan. 1 of the year you made the first contribution.
For example, if you opened your Roth IRA on Dec. 31, 2024, the holding period backs up to Jan. 1, 2024. Therefore, your holding period is technically only four years instead of five to avoid paying taxes on earnings.
However, it gets even better because you are allowed to make a Roth contribution for the prior tax year up until tax day in April. That means if you open a Roth in April 2025 and designate your contribution for 2024, your holding period is shortened by another four months.
This is why it’s important to open a Roth as soon as possible, even if you cannot contribute a lot of money in the near future. It makes a great strategy for a high school or college student with job earnings to at least open a Roth for future use. While there is no upfront tax deduction, you may withdraw contributions penalty and tax-free at any time – which makes it ideal as both a liquid emergency account as well as long-term savings.
As for withdrawing earnings, the rules are trickier. As far as the IRS is concerned, contributions are withdrawn first and then earnings. Note that when earnings are withdrawn before age 59½, the amount is subject to both taxes and a 10 percent penalty, but there are exceptions that waive the penalty. For example, if your account is less than five years old, you can still withdraw earnings (penalty-free but still subject to taxes) for the following purposes:
To help pay for a first-time home purchase (up to $10,000)
To pay for college
To pay certain emergency expenses
To pay for expenses in connection with a federally qualified disaster
To pay expenses related to a birth or adoption
To pay for unreimbursed medical expenses or health insurance if unemployed
If you become disabled or are a survivor of domestic abuse
If your account is older than five years, you can avoid both taxes and the penalty if the funds are used to help pay for a first-time home purchase (up to $10,000) or if you become disabled.
After age 59½, there are no taxes and no penalties for any money withdrawn from a Roth IRA for any reason.
Multiple Roths
The same five-year holding period applies to all the Roths you own, with the clock starting at the first contribution to your first Roth. This means that if five years after the date you open your first Roth, you open a new Roth and contribute a bunch of income, you won’t have to wait another five years to tap those earnings tax-free. This perk does not apply to a Roth 401(k) account, which maintains a separate five-year holding period.
Conversion Benefits
When you convert a traditional IRA or 401(k) to a Roth (assuming your plan allows in-service withdrawals or in-plan conversions), you must pay income taxes in the year the money is converted. However, there are some very good reasons to convert:
Tax-Free Income – By converting assets when you’re still working, you can pay the taxes owed with current income, but from that point on, the Roth IRA will grow tax-free. This is particularly helpful in diversifying your tax liability during retirement if you have other income sources (e.g., pension, brokerage account, Social Security).
Eliminate RMDs – If you continue working into your 70s, you may continue contributing to your Roth IRA, and assets converted from a 401(k) or traditional IRA are no longer subject to required minimum distributions. This way, your full account balance has the opportunity to continue growing for later retirement and/or for your heirs.
Be aware that converting a taxable retirement account to a Roth IRA begins its own five-year timetable, so convert long before you need to begin withdrawals.
Rules of the Roth
February 1, 2025 · Blog, Financial Planning
⏱ 4 min read
With a Roth IRA, the owner can make limited contributions each year. In 2025, the limit is $7,000; $8,000 if age 50 or older. Only people who earn less than $150,000 (single filers) or under $236,000 (married filing jointly) can make a full Roth IRA contribution. While contributions do not qualify for a tax deduction, earnings are not taxable once the account has been open for five years. Contributions, which were previously taxed as income, can be withdrawn at any time.
Once you open and contribute to a Roth IRA, the five-year countdown begins before you can take any earnings out tax-free. However, the holding period is actually measured from Jan. 1 of the year you made the first contribution.
For example, if you opened your Roth IRA on Dec. 31, 2024, the holding period backs up to Jan. 1, 2024. Therefore, your holding period is technically only four years instead of five to avoid paying taxes on earnings.
However, it gets even better because you are allowed to make a Roth contribution for the prior tax year up until tax day in April. That means if you open a Roth in April 2025 and designate your contribution for 2024, your holding period is shortened by another four months.
This is why it’s important to open a Roth as soon as possible, even if you cannot contribute a lot of money in the near future. It makes a great strategy for a high school or college student with job earnings to at least open a Roth for future use. While there is no upfront tax deduction, you may withdraw contributions penalty and tax-free at any time – which makes it ideal as both a liquid emergency account as well as long-term savings.
As for withdrawing earnings, the rules are trickier. As far as the IRS is concerned, contributions are withdrawn first and then earnings. Note that when earnings are withdrawn before age 59½, the amount is subject to both taxes and a 10 percent penalty, but there are exceptions that waive the penalty. For example, if your account is less than five years old, you can still withdraw earnings (penalty-free but still subject to taxes) for the following purposes:
To help pay for a first-time home purchase (up to $10,000)
To pay for college
To pay certain emergency expenses
To pay for expenses in connection with a federally qualified disaster
To pay expenses related to a birth or adoption
To pay for unreimbursed medical expenses or health insurance if unemployed
If you become disabled or are a survivor of domestic abuse
If your account is older than five years, you can avoid both taxes and the penalty if the funds are used to help pay for a first-time home purchase (up to $10,000) or if you become disabled.
After age 59½, there are no taxes and no penalties for any money withdrawn from a Roth IRA for any reason.
Multiple Roths
The same five-year holding period applies to all the Roths you own, with the clock starting at the first contribution to your first Roth. This means that if five years after the date you open your first Roth, you open a new Roth and contribute a bunch of income, you won’t have to wait another five years to tap those earnings tax-free. This perk does not apply to a Roth 401(k) account, which maintains a separate five-year holding period.
Conversion Benefits
When you convert a traditional IRA or 401(k) to a Roth (assuming your plan allows in-service withdrawals or in-plan conversions), you must pay income taxes in the year the money is converted. However, there are some very good reasons to convert:
Tax-Free Income – By converting assets when you’re still working, you can pay the taxes owed with current income, but from that point on, the Roth IRA will grow tax-free. This is particularly helpful in diversifying your tax liability during retirement if you have other income sources (e.g., pension, brokerage account, Social Security).
Eliminate RMDs – If you continue working into your 70s, you may continue contributing to your Roth IRA, and assets converted from a 401(k) or traditional IRA are no longer subject to required minimum distributions. This way, your full account balance has the opportunity to continue growing for later retirement and/or for your heirs.
Be aware that converting a taxable retirement account to a Roth IRA begins its own five-year timetable, so convert long before you need to begin withdrawals.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
As 2025 unfolds, U.S. tax policy is poised for significant shifts, particularly with a new Republican administration under President Donald Trump. The year ahead will likely see a range of tax reforms, largely driven by the GOP’s objectives and campaign promises. In this article, we’ll explore the major tax policy trends, legislative developments, and administration changes that may shape U.S. tax law in 2025.
The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions
2024 also saw two major Supreme Court decisions with significant tax implications. In the Moore case, the Court ruled narrowly on the issue of wealth taxation, leaving open the possibility of revisiting the question in the future. While wealth tax proposals had gained some traction among Democrats, the Court’s decision, combined with the political climate, suggests that such proposals are unlikely to gain much momentum under the new administration.
The Loper Bright decision, which questioned the deference given to government regulations, could have far-reaching effects on tax policy. The ruling makes it more difficult for agencies like the IRS to issue regulations without clear legislative guidance, potentially leading to more legal challenges to IRS regulations and shifting the balance of power between lawmakers and regulatory agencies.
2025: A New Republican Agenda
With a Republican administration taking office in 2025, tax policy is expected to shift dramatically. President Trump, along with a Republican-controlled Senate and House, will likely push for several key changes to tax law.
One of the primary objectives will be to extend provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that are set to expire. This includes individual tax cuts, corporate rate reductions and changes to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap. The extension of other expiring provisions involving lifetime gift and estate tax exemptions, AMT, child tax credits, and the mortgage interest deduction may also be on the table. Additionally, the GOP is expected to explore new tax cuts, with some lawmakers proposing measures like eliminating taxes on tips, which was promoted during Trump’s election campaign.
On the corporate side, there may be discussions about lowering the effective tax rate through credits and incentives rather than direct reductions to the statutory corporate tax rate. There also could be movement on tax expensing for research and development, as well as other measures to incentivize business investment.
Potential Revenue-Raising Measures
Despite the tax cuts expected to dominate the agenda, there may be some revenue-raising measures included in the GOP’s tax proposals. The focus on reducing deficits could lead to efforts to cut some of the green credits in the Inflation Reduction Act, although these cuts are unlikely to raise significant revenue. There also may be attempts to tighten international tax rules from the TCJA to generate more revenue.
President Trump has also proposed replacing individual income taxes with increases in tariffs, implementing a universal 20 percent tariff across the board, and implementing an additional 50 percent tariff on imports from China.
IRS Funding and Administration Changes
Under the new administration, the IRS is expected to face significant cuts, particularly in its enforcement budget. The $80 billion allocated to the agency in recent years, which was intended to improve taxpayer services and combat tax evasion, is likely to be rolled back. Republicans have expressed strong opposition to the IRS’ expanded powers and are expected to push for a reallocation of those funds toward customer service rather than enforcement.
Additionally, the new administration may replace current IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel, who was appointed during the Biden administration. Trump could nominate a new commissioner, and if this happens, it could spark further debates over the direction of the IRS in the coming years.
Conclusion
2025 promises to be a dynamic year for U.S. tax policy, with significant changes expected under the new administration. Key issues to watch include the fate of the TCJA’s expiring provisions, potential new tax cuts, and ongoing debates over IRS funding and regulations. As the administration works to implement its agenda, there will likely be contentious discussions and compromises on Capitol Hill, setting the stage for a new era of tax policy for the United States.
2025 U.S. Tax Legislation Forecast: What to Expect
February 1, 2025 · Blog, Tax and Financial News
⏱ 4 min read
As 2025 unfolds, U.S. tax policy is poised for significant shifts, particularly with a new Republican administration under President Donald Trump. The year ahead will likely see a range of tax reforms, largely driven by the GOP’s objectives and campaign promises. In this article, we’ll explore the major tax policy trends, legislative developments, and administration changes that may shape U.S. tax law in 2025.
The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions
2024 also saw two major Supreme Court decisions with significant tax implications. In the Moore case, the Court ruled narrowly on the issue of wealth taxation, leaving open the possibility of revisiting the question in the future. While wealth tax proposals had gained some traction among Democrats, the Court’s decision, combined with the political climate, suggests that such proposals are unlikely to gain much momentum under the new administration.
The Loper Bright decision, which questioned the deference given to government regulations, could have far-reaching effects on tax policy. The ruling makes it more difficult for agencies like the IRS to issue regulations without clear legislative guidance, potentially leading to more legal challenges to IRS regulations and shifting the balance of power between lawmakers and regulatory agencies.
2025: A New Republican Agenda
With a Republican administration taking office in 2025, tax policy is expected to shift dramatically. President Trump, along with a Republican-controlled Senate and House, will likely push for several key changes to tax law.
One of the primary objectives will be to extend provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that are set to expire. This includes individual tax cuts, corporate rate reductions and changes to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap. The extension of other expiring provisions involving lifetime gift and estate tax exemptions, AMT, child tax credits, and the mortgage interest deduction may also be on the table. Additionally, the GOP is expected to explore new tax cuts, with some lawmakers proposing measures like eliminating taxes on tips, which was promoted during Trump’s election campaign.
On the corporate side, there may be discussions about lowering the effective tax rate through credits and incentives rather than direct reductions to the statutory corporate tax rate. There also could be movement on tax expensing for research and development, as well as other measures to incentivize business investment.
Potential Revenue-Raising Measures
Despite the tax cuts expected to dominate the agenda, there may be some revenue-raising measures included in the GOP’s tax proposals. The focus on reducing deficits could lead to efforts to cut some of the green credits in the Inflation Reduction Act, although these cuts are unlikely to raise significant revenue. There also may be attempts to tighten international tax rules from the TCJA to generate more revenue.
President Trump has also proposed replacing individual income taxes with increases in tariffs, implementing a universal 20 percent tariff across the board, and implementing an additional 50 percent tariff on imports from China.
IRS Funding and Administration Changes
Under the new administration, the IRS is expected to face significant cuts, particularly in its enforcement budget. The $80 billion allocated to the agency in recent years, which was intended to improve taxpayer services and combat tax evasion, is likely to be rolled back. Republicans have expressed strong opposition to the IRS’ expanded powers and are expected to push for a reallocation of those funds toward customer service rather than enforcement.
Additionally, the new administration may replace current IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel, who was appointed during the Biden administration. Trump could nominate a new commissioner, and if this happens, it could spark further debates over the direction of the IRS in the coming years.
Conclusion
2025 promises to be a dynamic year for U.S. tax policy, with significant changes expected under the new administration. Key issues to watch include the fate of the TCJA’s expiring provisions, potential new tax cuts, and ongoing debates over IRS funding and regulations. As the administration works to implement its agenda, there will likely be contentious discussions and compromises on Capitol Hill, setting the stage for a new era of tax policy for the United States.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Laken Riley Act (S 5) – A holdover from the last congressional session, this bill was re-introduced by Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) on Jan. 6. It is similar to a 1996 law, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, that deports illegal immigrants who are found guilty of serious crimes. This new bill enables the government to detain and deport illegals who are arrested for serious crimes or misdemeanors (such as shoplifting), but they do not have to be charged or found guilty. The legislation passed in the Senate on Jan. 20 and the House on Jan. 22, and it is expected to be the first bill signed by the Trump administration.
Federal Disaster Assistance Coordination Act (HR 152) – This legislation would amend the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to authorize a new study designed to streamline and consolidate data regarding the collection of preliminary damage assessments. It was introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 13, and is currently in the Senate.
Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act (HR 153) – This is a disaster companion bill, also introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3. It would create an online repository for recipients of Federal disaster assistance to meet specific reporting requirements. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Jan. 14, and its fate also lies with the Senate.
POWER Act of 2025 (HR 164) – Also known as the Promoting Opportunities to Widen Electrical Resilience Act, this non-controversial bill was passed on Jan. 15 under a House procedure called “suspension of the rules.” It would allow Federal agencies to provide essential assistance for the emergency restoration of power and not restrict utility company recipients from also qualifying for hazard mitigation assistance if necessary. The bill amends the previous Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (1988), which details the process for federal government assistance to state and local governments following a major disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. Valerie Hoyle (D-OR) on Jan. 3 and currently lies with the Senate.
Fix Our Forests Act (HR 471) – The purpose of this bill is to expedite improvements in forest management activities on National Forest public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands. This bipartisan legislation was introduced by Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) on Jan. 16 and passed in the House on Jan. 23. It currently lies with the Senate.
MAPWaters Act of 2025 (HR 187) – This bipartisan bill authorizes the standardization, consolidation, and publication of federal waterways data regarding outdoor recreational uses by the public, as tracked by federal land and water management agencies. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 21, and is under consideration in the Senate.
Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government (HCon Res. 1) – This concurrent resolution was introduced on Jan. 3 by Rep. Michelle Fischbach (R-MN). It is a bipartisan resolution, agreed to by all four majority and minority leaders in both houses, that would allow members of the House and the Senate to assemble at a location outside the District of Columbia if it is in the public interest. The resolution passed in the House on Jan. 3 and currently rests in the Senate.
Beefing Up Laws for Illegal Immigrants and Preparing for Future Disasters
February 1, 2025 · Blog, Congress at Work
⏱ 3 min read
Laken Riley Act (S 5) – A holdover from the last congressional session, this bill was re-introduced by Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) on Jan. 6. It is similar to a 1996 law, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, that deports illegal immigrants who are found guilty of serious crimes. This new bill enables the government to detain and deport illegals who are arrested for serious crimes or misdemeanors (such as shoplifting), but they do not have to be charged or found guilty. The legislation passed in the Senate on Jan. 20 and the House on Jan. 22, and it is expected to be the first bill signed by the Trump administration.
Federal Disaster Assistance Coordination Act (HR 152) – This legislation would amend the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to authorize a new study designed to streamline and consolidate data regarding the collection of preliminary damage assessments. It was introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 13, and is currently in the Senate.
Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act (HR 153) – This is a disaster companion bill, also introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3. It would create an online repository for recipients of Federal disaster assistance to meet specific reporting requirements. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Jan. 14, and its fate also lies with the Senate.
POWER Act of 2025 (HR 164) – Also known as the Promoting Opportunities to Widen Electrical Resilience Act, this non-controversial bill was passed on Jan. 15 under a House procedure called “suspension of the rules.” It would allow Federal agencies to provide essential assistance for the emergency restoration of power and not restrict utility company recipients from also qualifying for hazard mitigation assistance if necessary. The bill amends the previous Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (1988), which details the process for federal government assistance to state and local governments following a major disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. Valerie Hoyle (D-OR) on Jan. 3 and currently lies with the Senate.
Fix Our Forests Act (HR 471) – The purpose of this bill is to expedite improvements in forest management activities on National Forest public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands. This bipartisan legislation was introduced by Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) on Jan. 16 and passed in the House on Jan. 23. It currently lies with the Senate.
MAPWaters Act of 2025 (HR 187) – This bipartisan bill authorizes the standardization, consolidation, and publication of federal waterways data regarding outdoor recreational uses by the public, as tracked by federal land and water management agencies. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 21, and is under consideration in the Senate.
Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government (HCon Res. 1) – This concurrent resolution was introduced on Jan. 3 by Rep. Michelle Fischbach (R-MN). It is a bipartisan resolution, agreed to by all four majority and minority leaders in both houses, that would allow members of the House and the Senate to assemble at a location outside the District of Columbia if it is in the public interest. The resolution passed in the House on Jan. 3 and currently rests in the Senate.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) is one way to help advertising and marketing professionals and investors analyze how well promotions do (or don’t) produce sales. It helps advertisers develop data based on their campaigns’ revenue production (or lack thereof). Understanding how this metric is calculated and how to analyze ROAS is essential for businesses to monitor and increase their advertising performance.
Known as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI), ROAS determines how much sales are generated per dollar invested on advertising outlays. It separates advertising costs from the company’s costs, and it focuses on:
1. The differences between advertising income and advertisement expenses
2. Assisting companies with creating efficient budgets
3. Identifying unprofitable campaigns
How ROAS is calculated:
Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) = Revenue generated from ad campaign/Total advertising costs for a specific campaign
The revenue generated from an ad campaign is the revenue immediately assignable to promotions utilizing a tracking tool.
Total advertising costs for a specific campaign are expenses explicitly connected to the advertising platform.
The resulting calculation determines the business’ return on ad spend, giving owners and managers an idea of how well (or not) ad spending impacts the company’s sales. It similarly enables business owners to reconcile the company’s budgeted advertising costs against growing sales metrics. The following hypothetical breakdown shows what a positive scenario looks like:
A ROAS of 10 = $10 of revenue was earned for every $1 spent on ads. This would translate into:
Total Ad Spend: $10,000
Revenue Generated: $100,000
ROAS = $10
ROAS = 10:1
Important considerations when calculating this include factoring in merchant expenses, costs for digital content production, and costs incurred from media platforms. It’s also important to consider that it’s not always cut-and-dry as to how and what specific ads convert potential customers into paying customers. Assigning the exact ad platform or campaign is a common problem when determining the exact ROAS.
Credit analysis conducted by lenders evaluates ROAS to determine the sales ability of companies seeking loans, especially with promotion-centric companies. The higher the ROAS, the less risk there is and the more reliable the revenue from each campaign. For merger and acquisition professionals, ROAS trends offer insight into a target company’s sustainability. It helps determine if a company’s advertising campaigns can sustain themselves and keep generating future growth.
It’s equally important to see how ROAS compares against other metrics. While ROAS focuses on revenue generated per dollar spent, the advertising-to-sales ratio looks at the total proportion of sales driven by advertising efforts. Similarly, while ROAS measures the revenue per ad spend, return on investment analyzes the comprehensive profitability for the complete level of marketing expenses – not exclusively advertising. While ROAS is a short-term measure on instant sales, Lifetime Value looks at the customer’s history with the company and the entire revenue the company earns from the relationship.
While this metric is helpful for many professionals, it’s important to ensure that only necessary data is included and customer conversion is monitored precisely in order to get the best output.
Analyzing Return on Ad Spending
February 1, 2025 · Blog, General Business News
⏱ 3 min read
Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) is one way to help advertising and marketing professionals and investors analyze how well promotions do (or don’t) produce sales. It helps advertisers develop data based on their campaigns’ revenue production (or lack thereof). Understanding how this metric is calculated and how to analyze ROAS is essential for businesses to monitor and increase their advertising performance.
Known as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI), ROAS determines how much sales are generated per dollar invested on advertising outlays. It separates advertising costs from the company’s costs, and it focuses on:
1. The differences between advertising income and advertisement expenses
2. Assisting companies with creating efficient budgets
3. Identifying unprofitable campaigns
How ROAS is calculated:
Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) = Revenue generated from ad campaign/Total advertising costs for a specific campaign
The revenue generated from an ad campaign is the revenue immediately assignable to promotions utilizing a tracking tool.
Total advertising costs for a specific campaign are expenses explicitly connected to the advertising platform.
The resulting calculation determines the business’ return on ad spend, giving owners and managers an idea of how well (or not) ad spending impacts the company’s sales. It similarly enables business owners to reconcile the company’s budgeted advertising costs against growing sales metrics. The following hypothetical breakdown shows what a positive scenario looks like:
A ROAS of 10 = $10 of revenue was earned for every $1 spent on ads. This would translate into:
Total Ad Spend: $10,000
Revenue Generated: $100,000
ROAS = $10
ROAS = 10:1
Important considerations when calculating this include factoring in merchant expenses, costs for digital content production, and costs incurred from media platforms. It’s also important to consider that it’s not always cut-and-dry as to how and what specific ads convert potential customers into paying customers. Assigning the exact ad platform or campaign is a common problem when determining the exact ROAS.
Credit analysis conducted by lenders evaluates ROAS to determine the sales ability of companies seeking loans, especially with promotion-centric companies. The higher the ROAS, the less risk there is and the more reliable the revenue from each campaign. For merger and acquisition professionals, ROAS trends offer insight into a target company’s sustainability. It helps determine if a company’s advertising campaigns can sustain themselves and keep generating future growth.
It’s equally important to see how ROAS compares against other metrics. While ROAS focuses on revenue generated per dollar spent, the advertising-to-sales ratio looks at the total proportion of sales driven by advertising efforts. Similarly, while ROAS measures the revenue per ad spend, return on investment analyzes the comprehensive profitability for the complete level of marketing expenses – not exclusively advertising. While ROAS is a short-term measure on instant sales, Lifetime Value looks at the customer’s history with the company and the entire revenue the company earns from the relationship.
While this metric is helpful for many professionals, it’s important to ensure that only necessary data is included and customer conversion is monitored precisely in order to get the best output.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Whether you file your income tax return early or at the last minute, there are ways to simplify the process and reduce what you owe – or even increase your refund – before the deadline.
Filing Simplification Tip
Once you receive your W-2 and/or 1099 tax forms, see what income tax bracket you fall under to determine whether you should itemize expenses or take the standard deduction. Thinking about this step first can save you a lot of time. If you don’t come near the standard deduction amount, you will not be itemizing expenses. And if you are not itemizing expenses, you won’t have to gather all the receipts (e.g., mortgage interest, property tax, state and local income taxes, and sales tax paid in 2024).
2024 Tax Season Income Tax Brackets
Single filer
Married filing separately
Married filing jointly (includes qualifying widow/er)
Head of Household
Tax Rate
$0 to $11,600
$0 to $11,600
$0 to $23,200
$0 to $16,550
10%
$11,601 to $47,150
$11,601 to $47,150
$23,201 to $94,300
$16,551 to $63,100
12%
$47,151 to $100,525
$47,151 to $100,525
$94,301 to $201,050
$63,101 to $100,500
22%
$100,526 to $191,950
$100,526 to $191,950
$201,051 to $383,900
$100,501 to $191,950
24%
$191,951 to $243,725
$191,951 to $243,725
$383,901 to $487,450
$191,951 to $243,700
32%
$243,726 to $609,350
$243,726 to $365,600
$487,451 to $731,200
$243,701 to $609,350
35%
$609,351 or more
$365,601 or more
$731,201 or more
$609,351 or more
37%
2024 Tax Season Standard Deductions
Single filer and married filing separately
Married filing jointly (includes qualifying widow/er)
Head of Household
$14,600
$29,200
$21,900
Retirement Saving Tips
It’s not too late to contribute to an IRA. Both the traditional and Roth IRAs allow you to make contributions for 2024 up until the tax-filing deadline of the following year – which this year is Tuesday, April 15. The advantage to this later deadline is that you can complete your taxes before they are due, then adjust them to reduce your tax liability if needed by contributing to your IRA. The total maximum contribution you can make to all of your IRAs combined (both Roths and traditional) is $7,000 for 2024 or $8,000 if you are 50 years or older.
However, if you have a Roth IRA, there are restrictions to contributions based on your 2024 income. You may make the maximum contribution to your Roth only if your 2024 modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is less than a certain threshold.
Filing Status
MAGI
Contribution amount
Single and Head of Household filers
Below $146,000
Between $146,001 and 161,000
Above $161,000
$7,000/$8,000 (age 50+)
Phased (IRS Worksheet 2-2)
Nothing
Married filing jointly
(includes qualifying widow/er)
Below $230,000
Between $230,000 and $240,000
Above $240,000
$7,000/$8,000 (age 50+)
Phased (IRS Worksheet 2-2)
Nothing
Be aware that the amount of deduction you can claim for a traditional IRA contribution may be limited if you or your spouse are covered by a retirement plan at work.
Filing Status
MAGI
Deduction amount
Single and Head of Household filers
$77,000 or less
Between $77,000 and 87,000
$87,000 or more
Full deduction
Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)
None
Married filing jointly
(includes qualifying widow/er)
$123,000 or less
Between $123,000 and 143,000
$143,000 or more
Full deduction
Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)
None
Married filing separately
Less than $10,000
$10,000 or more
Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)
None
If you make a traditional and/or Roth IRA contribution by the April 15 deadline, you may qualify for the Retirement Saver’s Credit (also available if you contributed to an employer plan by Dec. 31, 2024). The maximum credit is $1,000 ($2,000 for married couples), and it can increase your refund or reduce the tax you owe. However, the saver’s credit is subject to other deductions, credits, and income restrictions.
Filing Status
MAGI
Single and Married filing separately
up to $57,375
Married couples filing jointly
(includes qualifying widow/er)
up to $76,500
Head of Household Filers
up to $57,375
Work with an experienced tax preparer to take advantage of legitimate deductions and credits to ensure that you only pay what is required for your situation.
Tips for Tax Season
January 1, 2025 · Blog, Financial Planning
⏱ 4 min read
Whether you file your income tax return early or at the last minute, there are ways to simplify the process and reduce what you owe – or even increase your refund – before the deadline.
Filing Simplification Tip
Once you receive your W-2 and/or 1099 tax forms, see what income tax bracket you fall under to determine whether you should itemize expenses or take the standard deduction. Thinking about this step first can save you a lot of time. If you don’t come near the standard deduction amount, you will not be itemizing expenses. And if you are not itemizing expenses, you won’t have to gather all the receipts (e.g., mortgage interest, property tax, state and local income taxes, and sales tax paid in 2024).
2024 Tax Season Income Tax Brackets
Single filer
Married filing separately
Married filing jointly (includes qualifying widow/er)
Head of Household
Tax Rate
$0 to $11,600
$0 to $11,600
$0 to $23,200
$0 to $16,550
10%
$11,601 to $47,150
$11,601 to $47,150
$23,201 to $94,300
$16,551 to $63,100
12%
$47,151 to $100,525
$47,151 to $100,525
$94,301 to $201,050
$63,101 to $100,500
22%
$100,526 to $191,950
$100,526 to $191,950
$201,051 to $383,900
$100,501 to $191,950
24%
$191,951 to $243,725
$191,951 to $243,725
$383,901 to $487,450
$191,951 to $243,700
32%
$243,726 to $609,350
$243,726 to $365,600
$487,451 to $731,200
$243,701 to $609,350
35%
$609,351 or more
$365,601 or more
$731,201 or more
$609,351 or more
37%
2024 Tax Season Standard Deductions
Single filer and married filing separately
Married filing jointly (includes qualifying widow/er)
Head of Household
$14,600
$29,200
$21,900
Retirement Saving Tips
It’s not too late to contribute to an IRA. Both the traditional and Roth IRAs allow you to make contributions for 2024 up until the tax-filing deadline of the following year – which this year is Tuesday, April 15. The advantage to this later deadline is that you can complete your taxes before they are due, then adjust them to reduce your tax liability if needed by contributing to your IRA. The total maximum contribution you can make to all of your IRAs combined (both Roths and traditional) is $7,000 for 2024 or $8,000 if you are 50 years or older.
However, if you have a Roth IRA, there are restrictions to contributions based on your 2024 income. You may make the maximum contribution to your Roth only if your 2024 modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is less than a certain threshold.
Filing Status
MAGI
Contribution amount
Single and Head of Household filers
Below $146,000
Between $146,001 and 161,000
Above $161,000
$7,000/$8,000 (age 50+)
Phased (IRS Worksheet 2-2)
Nothing
Married filing jointly
(includes qualifying widow/er)
Below $230,000
Between $230,000 and $240,000
Above $240,000
$7,000/$8,000 (age 50+)
Phased (IRS Worksheet 2-2)
Nothing
Be aware that the amount of deduction you can claim for a traditional IRA contribution may be limited if you or your spouse are covered by a retirement plan at work.
Filing Status
MAGI
Deduction amount
Single and Head of Household filers
$77,000 or less
Between $77,000 and 87,000
$87,000 or more
Full deduction
Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)
None
Married filing jointly
(includes qualifying widow/er)
$123,000 or less
Between $123,000 and 143,000
$143,000 or more
Full deduction
Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)
None
Married filing separately
Less than $10,000
$10,000 or more
Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)
None
If you make a traditional and/or Roth IRA contribution by the April 15 deadline, you may qualify for the Retirement Saver’s Credit (also available if you contributed to an employer plan by Dec. 31, 2024). The maximum credit is $1,000 ($2,000 for married couples), and it can increase your refund or reduce the tax you owe. However, the saver’s credit is subject to other deductions, credits, and income restrictions.
Filing Status
MAGI
Single and Married filing separately
up to $57,375
Married couples filing jointly
(includes qualifying widow/er)
up to $76,500
Head of Household Filers
up to $57,375
Work with an experienced tax preparer to take advantage of legitimate deductions and credits to ensure that you only pay what is required for your situation.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Here we are in yet another new year. The obligations and celebrations are over. Chances are, you’ve spent a fair amount over the holidays and might need a plan to help kickstart 2025 with some actionable financial goals. Here are a few ideas.
Create a Budget
This one never gets old. Why? It’s one of the keys to successful budgeting. You can set up a budget for the year that includes essentials, entertainment, and nice-to-haves, aka your Wish Farm. Then place it in your planner or app – there are many good ones out there. In fact, there’s a TikTok trend called loud budgeting, where people openly discuss their financial goals on social media – why they do or don’t want to buy something. If this is your thing and it helps you stay on track, go for it! If not, a good old-fashioned planner works just as well.
Bucket Your Money
This is the next step after the aforementioned. Split your money into categories: food, rent/ mortgage, utilities, medical, entertainment, vacation, etc. Apps can help you parse out these groups. You might also set up separate banking accounts for some of the necessities so you’ll know to leave them alone and not dip into them, tempting as it may be.
Set Up Auto-Drafts
Let’s say you’re saving for your child’s college fund or a down payment on a car. When you create an auto-draft for a certain amount, you’ll never miss that deposit. If you need to tweak the amount during the year, do it. Here’s the bottom line: 1) You’ll learn to live on less, and 2) you’ll be on the way to making your dreams come true.
Look for Savings Deals
Don’t just settle for the interest rate your current bank is offering. There are many options out there to grow your money. But first, do you want to lock into a fixed rate? This can be useful for long-term goals, such as buying a property. Or do you want an easy-to-access account with the ability to withdraw cash for emergencies or short-term needs like birthday or wedding gifts? Shop around.
Cancel Seldom-Used Subscriptions
Scour your bank statement. Do you need all those online magazine subscriptions? How about newsletters you pay for – the ones you rarely read? Purge your subscriptions, then see how much you’ll save. If you’re so inclined, you could put these dollars toward a gym membership. January is when all the specials appear: zero joining fees, if not a seriously cut rate.
Start a Savings Challenge
Try putting away a small amount every month. Get in the habit of emptying your pockets or coin purse. Safeguard your coins in a mason jar, and then transfer them monthly into your savings account. The next month, increase how much you contribute. Pennies, nickels, dimes, and quarters add up! After a year, you might be surprised how much you’ve saved.
Decide on Goals
These can be small or large. It’s up to you. Spend some time thinking about what’s important. Do you want to remodel your house? Contribute to a beloved charity or cause? One resource you might want to consider setting up is an emergency spending pot. This is essential and sometimes overlooked. Regardless of what you decide, figure out your parameters: how much to set aside, how often, and by when. Having financial targets gives you something to look forward to. Best of all, when you achieve your goal, it’s an awesome feeling.
More often than not, New Year’s resolutions center on getting physically fit. But if you stay the course with your finances, you’ll most definitely be, wait for it … fiscally fit!
Sources
10 things you can do right now to start 2025 with fresh finances
Here we are in yet another new year. The obligations and celebrations are over. Chances are, you’ve spent a fair amount over the holidays and might need a plan to help kickstart 2025 with some actionable financial goals. Here are a few ideas.
Create a Budget
This one never gets old. Why? It’s one of the keys to successful budgeting. You can set up a budget for the year that includes essentials, entertainment, and nice-to-haves, aka your Wish Farm. Then place it in your planner or app – there are many good ones out there. In fact, there’s a TikTok trend called loud budgeting, where people openly discuss their financial goals on social media – why they do or don’t want to buy something. If this is your thing and it helps you stay on track, go for it! If not, a good old-fashioned planner works just as well.
Bucket Your Money
This is the next step after the aforementioned. Split your money into categories: food, rent/ mortgage, utilities, medical, entertainment, vacation, etc. Apps can help you parse out these groups. You might also set up separate banking accounts for some of the necessities so you’ll know to leave them alone and not dip into them, tempting as it may be.
Set Up Auto-Drafts
Let’s say you’re saving for your child’s college fund or a down payment on a car. When you create an auto-draft for a certain amount, you’ll never miss that deposit. If you need to tweak the amount during the year, do it. Here’s the bottom line: 1) You’ll learn to live on less, and 2) you’ll be on the way to making your dreams come true.
Look for Savings Deals
Don’t just settle for the interest rate your current bank is offering. There are many options out there to grow your money. But first, do you want to lock into a fixed rate? This can be useful for long-term goals, such as buying a property. Or do you want an easy-to-access account with the ability to withdraw cash for emergencies or short-term needs like birthday or wedding gifts? Shop around.
Cancel Seldom-Used Subscriptions
Scour your bank statement. Do you need all those online magazine subscriptions? How about newsletters you pay for – the ones you rarely read? Purge your subscriptions, then see how much you’ll save. If you’re so inclined, you could put these dollars toward a gym membership. January is when all the specials appear: zero joining fees, if not a seriously cut rate.
Start a Savings Challenge
Try putting away a small amount every month. Get in the habit of emptying your pockets or coin purse. Safeguard your coins in a mason jar, and then transfer them monthly into your savings account. The next month, increase how much you contribute. Pennies, nickels, dimes, and quarters add up! After a year, you might be surprised how much you’ve saved.
Decide on Goals
These can be small or large. It’s up to you. Spend some time thinking about what’s important. Do you want to remodel your house? Contribute to a beloved charity or cause? One resource you might want to consider setting up is an emergency spending pot. This is essential and sometimes overlooked. Regardless of what you decide, figure out your parameters: how much to set aside, how often, and by when. Having financial targets gives you something to look forward to. Best of all, when you achieve your goal, it’s an awesome feeling.
More often than not, New Year’s resolutions center on getting physically fit. But if you stay the course with your finances, you’ll most definitely be, wait for it … fiscally fit!
Sources
10 things you can do right now to start 2025 with fresh finances
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
A Dec. 3 proposal from FASB’s Accounting Standards Update (ASU) might provide some flexibility for private businesses and select nonprofits. “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326)” looks at measuring credit losses for contract assets and accounts receivable for these entities.
When it comes to determining projected credit losses for current accounts receivables and current contract assets, businesses face immense resource needs and reporting requirements, including for assets acquired prior to the publication dates of financial statements.
With public comments being received through Jan. 17, 2025, industry professionals have reported that when it comes to gauging projected credit losses for current contract assets and current accounts receivable, there’s a massive undertaking and validation necessary for assets collected prior to financial statement issuance dates. Industry professionals argue that being able to factor in collections post-balance sheet date in calculating expected credit losses would reduce the complexity for preparers, whereas, for third parties, including investors and others who utilize financial statements, it would provide them with valuable data.
FASB proposed an amendment to ASC 326 207 to allow private companies and certain not-for-profit entities to employ a more flexible and efficient way to better gauge their projected credit losses for current contract assets and accounts receivable that originate from transaction accounts under ASC 606.
Working with the Private Company Council (PCC) to look at stakeholders’ concerns that estimating projected credit losses can be exorbitant and complicated for financial proceedings, FASB is soliciting comments on whether or not to expand the scope of entities included for ASU standards, along with different asset classes.
Current Criteria
According to ASC 326-20, when expected credit losses are estimated by entities, an entity must evaluate their ability to garner cash flows via the lens of contemporary economic circumstances, rational and documented projections, and past losses. Past losses may need to be fine-tuned to approximate project credit losses if past circumstances change from present conditions or from well-ground estimates and documented projections. Another consideration when formulating credit loss projections is that entities aren’t required to factor in collections obtained post-balance sheet date.
Proposed Additions
When it comes to the proposed additions, FASB speaks to a practical expedient and an accounting policy election. The practical expedient concerns an entity’s well-grounded, data-dependent projections. If an entity chooses the practical expedient, it would be able to factor in collection activity beyond the balance sheet date when projecting expected credit losses.
Practical Expedient
To formulate projections that are rational and based on verified accounting details, this so-called practical expedient can be chosen by the entity that assumes its present balance sheet conditions will last for the entire projection time frame. Choosing a practical expedient also implies that an entity’s accounting policy will factor in collection activity past its balance sheet date when gauging expected credit losses. Specifically, under 326-20-30-10C for the practical expedient, during the projection time frame, an entity will maintain the exact circumstances of the balance sheet throughout the rational and data-based projection period.
If a business, for example, has determined a particular client is facing monetary challenges, it would account for its client’s financial issues through projections of estimated expected credit losses for said client, even though it has not impacted the business’ historical loss experience or if the business is up to date as of the balance sheet date.
Accounting Policy Election
Per 326-20-30-10E, when a practical expedient from 326-20-30-10C through 30-10D is chosen by entities for their accounting policy election when projecting credit losses, it signals that the entity factors in collection activity after the balance sheet date, but prior to the date of financial statement issuance. If an entity uses one or both of the practical expedient and/or accounting policy elections, disclosure is mandatory.
Conclusion
Lastly, such advice would be administered on a forward-looking basis, and both of these entities (PCC and FASB) will make the ultimate findings and guidelines of the implementation dates once industry professionals’ comments are considered. However, entities will likely be able to utilize these guidelines sooner.
For eligible companies, these standards could provide greater flexibility and the ability to divert resources to more productive allocations.
How Reporting Might be Less Complex in 2025
January 1, 2025 · Accounting News, Blog
⏱ 4 min read
A Dec. 3 proposal from FASB’s Accounting Standards Update (ASU) might provide some flexibility for private businesses and select nonprofits. “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326)” looks at measuring credit losses for contract assets and accounts receivable for these entities.
When it comes to determining projected credit losses for current accounts receivables and current contract assets, businesses face immense resource needs and reporting requirements, including for assets acquired prior to the publication dates of financial statements.
With public comments being received through Jan. 17, 2025, industry professionals have reported that when it comes to gauging projected credit losses for current contract assets and current accounts receivable, there’s a massive undertaking and validation necessary for assets collected prior to financial statement issuance dates. Industry professionals argue that being able to factor in collections post-balance sheet date in calculating expected credit losses would reduce the complexity for preparers, whereas, for third parties, including investors and others who utilize financial statements, it would provide them with valuable data.
FASB proposed an amendment to ASC 326 207 to allow private companies and certain not-for-profit entities to employ a more flexible and efficient way to better gauge their projected credit losses for current contract assets and accounts receivable that originate from transaction accounts under ASC 606.
Working with the Private Company Council (PCC) to look at stakeholders’ concerns that estimating projected credit losses can be exorbitant and complicated for financial proceedings, FASB is soliciting comments on whether or not to expand the scope of entities included for ASU standards, along with different asset classes.
Current Criteria
According to ASC 326-20, when expected credit losses are estimated by entities, an entity must evaluate their ability to garner cash flows via the lens of contemporary economic circumstances, rational and documented projections, and past losses. Past losses may need to be fine-tuned to approximate project credit losses if past circumstances change from present conditions or from well-ground estimates and documented projections. Another consideration when formulating credit loss projections is that entities aren’t required to factor in collections obtained post-balance sheet date.
Proposed Additions
When it comes to the proposed additions, FASB speaks to a practical expedient and an accounting policy election. The practical expedient concerns an entity’s well-grounded, data-dependent projections. If an entity chooses the practical expedient, it would be able to factor in collection activity beyond the balance sheet date when projecting expected credit losses.
Practical Expedient
To formulate projections that are rational and based on verified accounting details, this so-called practical expedient can be chosen by the entity that assumes its present balance sheet conditions will last for the entire projection time frame. Choosing a practical expedient also implies that an entity’s accounting policy will factor in collection activity past its balance sheet date when gauging expected credit losses. Specifically, under 326-20-30-10C for the practical expedient, during the projection time frame, an entity will maintain the exact circumstances of the balance sheet throughout the rational and data-based projection period.
If a business, for example, has determined a particular client is facing monetary challenges, it would account for its client’s financial issues through projections of estimated expected credit losses for said client, even though it has not impacted the business’ historical loss experience or if the business is up to date as of the balance sheet date.
Accounting Policy Election
Per 326-20-30-10E, when a practical expedient from 326-20-30-10C through 30-10D is chosen by entities for their accounting policy election when projecting credit losses, it signals that the entity factors in collection activity after the balance sheet date, but prior to the date of financial statement issuance. If an entity uses one or both of the practical expedient and/or accounting policy elections, disclosure is mandatory.
Conclusion
Lastly, such advice would be administered on a forward-looking basis, and both of these entities (PCC and FASB) will make the ultimate findings and guidelines of the implementation dates once industry professionals’ comments are considered. However, entities will likely be able to utilize these guidelines sooner.
For eligible companies, these standards could provide greater flexibility and the ability to divert resources to more productive allocations.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, formally known as H.R. 82, aimed at ending two provisions in the Social Security system that affect public sector employees who have earned pensions from jobs not covered by Social Security. These provisions are the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, both of which reduce or eliminate Social Security benefits for workers who have worked in both public-sector and private-sector jobs.
The Problem: WEP and GPO
The Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset were originally designed to prevent public sector workers from receiving larger Social Security benefits than they would have been entitled to had they worked in jobs covered by Social Security for their entire careers. However, critics argue that these provisions disproportionately harm workers who have spent a significant portion of their careers in public service, such as teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other state and local government employees.
Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP):
The WEP reduces the Social Security benefits of individuals who have worked in both the private sector (where they paid into Social Security) and the public sector (where they often did not contribute to Social Security). Typically, Social Security benefits are based on an individual’s 35 highest-earning years. The WEP alters the formula used to calculate benefits for individuals with fewer than 30 years of substantial earnings in Social Security-covered employment, leading to a lower Social Security benefit than they would otherwise be entitled to. For many, this results in a significant reduction in the monthly payment they would have received under the standard Social Security formula.
Government Pension Offset (GPO):
The GPO affects spouses and widows/widowers of Social Security beneficiaries. Under this provision, individuals who receive a government pension from work that was not covered by Social Security (such as state or local government employees) see a reduction in their spousal or survivor benefits from Social Security. The offset is calculated by reducing the spousal or survivor benefit by an amount equal to two-thirds of the government pension. This can leave many public employees with little to no spousal or survivor benefits despite their spouse having paid into Social Security.
What H.R. 82 Seeks to Accomplish
By eliminating both the WEP and GPO, the bill aims to ensure that public sector workers who have earned Social Security benefits through their work in the private sector are not penalized by reductions in those benefits. It also seeks to provide fairer treatment for the spouses and survivors of government employees who may otherwise see their Social Security benefits reduced or eliminated entirely.
The bill has garnered bipartisan support, as lawmakers from both sides of the aisle recognize the fairness of eliminating these provisions, which many see as an unjust penalty against those who have dedicated their careers to public service. H.R. 82, if passed, would provide much-needed relief to millions of retirees, many of who are struggling with the financial impacts of these provisions.
Conclusion:
The introduction of H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, marks a crucial point in the ongoing debate over Social Security benefits for public sector workers. By eliminating the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, the bill would restore fairness and equity for millions of public employees who have spent their careers in service to their communities. As this bill progresses, it will likely remain a significant issue in discussions surrounding Social Security reform and the treatment of public sector employees.
President Joe Biden signed H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act, into law on Sunday, January 5, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. Central Time Zone.
The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023: More Retirement Income for Teachers, Police, Firefighters & Gov. Workers
January 1, 2025 · Blog, Guest Article of the Month
⏱ 3 min read
The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, formally known as H.R. 82, aimed at ending two provisions in the Social Security system that affect public sector employees who have earned pensions from jobs not covered by Social Security. These provisions are the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, both of which reduce or eliminate Social Security benefits for workers who have worked in both public-sector and private-sector jobs.
The Problem: WEP and GPO
The Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset were originally designed to prevent public sector workers from receiving larger Social Security benefits than they would have been entitled to had they worked in jobs covered by Social Security for their entire careers. However, critics argue that these provisions disproportionately harm workers who have spent a significant portion of their careers in public service, such as teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other state and local government employees.
Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP):
The WEP reduces the Social Security benefits of individuals who have worked in both the private sector (where they paid into Social Security) and the public sector (where they often did not contribute to Social Security). Typically, Social Security benefits are based on an individual’s 35 highest-earning years. The WEP alters the formula used to calculate benefits for individuals with fewer than 30 years of substantial earnings in Social Security-covered employment, leading to a lower Social Security benefit than they would otherwise be entitled to. For many, this results in a significant reduction in the monthly payment they would have received under the standard Social Security formula.
Government Pension Offset (GPO):
The GPO affects spouses and widows/widowers of Social Security beneficiaries. Under this provision, individuals who receive a government pension from work that was not covered by Social Security (such as state or local government employees) see a reduction in their spousal or survivor benefits from Social Security. The offset is calculated by reducing the spousal or survivor benefit by an amount equal to two-thirds of the government pension. This can leave many public employees with little to no spousal or survivor benefits despite their spouse having paid into Social Security.
What H.R. 82 Seeks to Accomplish
By eliminating both the WEP and GPO, the bill aims to ensure that public sector workers who have earned Social Security benefits through their work in the private sector are not penalized by reductions in those benefits. It also seeks to provide fairer treatment for the spouses and survivors of government employees who may otherwise see their Social Security benefits reduced or eliminated entirely.
The bill has garnered bipartisan support, as lawmakers from both sides of the aisle recognize the fairness of eliminating these provisions, which many see as an unjust penalty against those who have dedicated their careers to public service. H.R. 82, if passed, would provide much-needed relief to millions of retirees, many of who are struggling with the financial impacts of these provisions.
Conclusion:
The introduction of H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, marks a crucial point in the ongoing debate over Social Security benefits for public sector workers. By eliminating the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, the bill would restore fairness and equity for millions of public employees who have spent their careers in service to their communities. As this bill progresses, it will likely remain a significant issue in discussions surrounding Social Security reform and the treatment of public sector employees.
President Joe Biden signed H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act, into law on Sunday, January 5, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. Central Time Zone.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
The word “innocent” in innocent spouse relief can be misleading. It doesn’t imply you’re perfect or blameless – it’s more about whether you knew or should have known about the tax issue. The IRS defines “innocence” in a specific way, and it hinges on the concept of reasonable ignorance. In short, the issue isn’t one of morality; it’s about whether you could have reasonably been unaware of a tax problem.
Innocent spouse relief allows you to avoid being held responsible for tax debts, penalties, and interest stemming from a joint tax filing. In the case that a spouse (or ex-spouse) made an error that led to a tax issue, regardless of intention, you may not have to shoulder the burden. Say your income wasn’t reported, excessive deductions were claimed, or tax fraud was committed. If you meet the IRS criteria, you can request relief by submitting Form 8857.
Qualifications for Innocent Spouse Relief
To qualify, you must meet several conditions.
Joint Tax Return: The tax liability must arise from a joint return. When you file together, both spouses are equally responsible for any tax issues that arise.
Tax Underreporting: The tax issue must stem from underreported income or an incorrect claim for deductions or credits. This could involve unreported income (like from offshore accounts) or fraudulent deductions made by your spouse.
Lack of Knowledge: You must show that, at the time of filing, you were unaware of the problem and had no reason to suspect it.
Unfair Responsibility: Lastly, it must be deemed unjust to hold you liable. The IRS looks at factors such as whether you benefited from the underreported taxes (e.g., through extravagant spending) or if you’ve divorced.
What Doesn’t Qualify for Innocent Spouse Relief?
Not all cases involving a spouse’s financial mismanagement qualify for relief. The IRS may reject your claim in the following situations:
Awareness of the Mistake: If you knew about the issue or should have known, you won’t be eligible for relief. Simply stating that you didn’t read the return won’t suffice. The IRS expects you to recognize obvious errors if you have access to the relevant information.
Divorce Doesn’t Automatically Provide Relief: Divorce alone doesn’t eliminate your liability for tax debt. Joint returns create shared responsibility, and being separated or divorced doesn’t mean the IRS will automatically release you from this obligation. You must prove your innocence through the relief process.
Disagreements Over Personal Spending: If your spouse’s spending decisions are something you disagree with, the IRS will not consider it a tax issue unless it involves unreported income or fraudulent deductions. The IRS focuses on tax matters, not marital conflicts over financial choices.
Pros and Cons of Filing
Advantages include:
Avoid Financial Hardship: Tax liabilities, along with interest and penalties, can be overwhelming. Innocent spouse relief can protect you from these financial burdens.
Clear Your Name: If you’ve been unfairly tied to a tax issue you didn’t cause, the relief process can help remove you from the responsibility.
Peace of Mind: Successfully claiming relief can bring emotional relief, especially if you’ve gone through a challenging marriage.
Potential drawbacks are:
No Guarantee of Approval: The IRS does not grant relief easily. You’ll need to provide strong evidence, and the process can be lengthy and difficult.
Time Limitations: You generally must apply for relief within two years of the IRS starting collection efforts. Missing this deadline could result in losing the opportunity for relief.
Invasive Process: The IRS will closely examine your financial and personal life, including details about your marriage and finances, which could feel intrusive if you value your privacy.
Possible Strain on Relationships: If you’re still married, filing for relief could cause tension, as it might be seen as blaming your spouse for the tax issue.
Conclusion
To request innocent spouse relief, you’ll need to file Form 8857. Be prepared to provide details about the tax years involved, explain why you didn’t know about the issue, and any supporting documents (like bank statements, emails, or divorce decrees.
After submitting the form, the IRS will notify your spouse or ex-spouse, who will have a chance to respond by a specific date.
What is Innocent Spouse Relief?
January 1, 2025 · Blog, Tax and Financial News
⏱ 4 min read
The word “innocent” in innocent spouse relief can be misleading. It doesn’t imply you’re perfect or blameless – it’s more about whether you knew or should have known about the tax issue. The IRS defines “innocence” in a specific way, and it hinges on the concept of reasonable ignorance. In short, the issue isn’t one of morality; it’s about whether you could have reasonably been unaware of a tax problem.
Innocent spouse relief allows you to avoid being held responsible for tax debts, penalties, and interest stemming from a joint tax filing. In the case that a spouse (or ex-spouse) made an error that led to a tax issue, regardless of intention, you may not have to shoulder the burden. Say your income wasn’t reported, excessive deductions were claimed, or tax fraud was committed. If you meet the IRS criteria, you can request relief by submitting Form 8857.
Qualifications for Innocent Spouse Relief
To qualify, you must meet several conditions.
Joint Tax Return: The tax liability must arise from a joint return. When you file together, both spouses are equally responsible for any tax issues that arise.
Tax Underreporting: The tax issue must stem from underreported income or an incorrect claim for deductions or credits. This could involve unreported income (like from offshore accounts) or fraudulent deductions made by your spouse.
Lack of Knowledge: You must show that, at the time of filing, you were unaware of the problem and had no reason to suspect it.
Unfair Responsibility: Lastly, it must be deemed unjust to hold you liable. The IRS looks at factors such as whether you benefited from the underreported taxes (e.g., through extravagant spending) or if you’ve divorced.
What Doesn’t Qualify for Innocent Spouse Relief?
Not all cases involving a spouse’s financial mismanagement qualify for relief. The IRS may reject your claim in the following situations:
Awareness of the Mistake: If you knew about the issue or should have known, you won’t be eligible for relief. Simply stating that you didn’t read the return won’t suffice. The IRS expects you to recognize obvious errors if you have access to the relevant information.
Divorce Doesn’t Automatically Provide Relief: Divorce alone doesn’t eliminate your liability for tax debt. Joint returns create shared responsibility, and being separated or divorced doesn’t mean the IRS will automatically release you from this obligation. You must prove your innocence through the relief process.
Disagreements Over Personal Spending: If your spouse’s spending decisions are something you disagree with, the IRS will not consider it a tax issue unless it involves unreported income or fraudulent deductions. The IRS focuses on tax matters, not marital conflicts over financial choices.
Pros and Cons of Filing
Advantages include:
Avoid Financial Hardship: Tax liabilities, along with interest and penalties, can be overwhelming. Innocent spouse relief can protect you from these financial burdens.
Clear Your Name: If you’ve been unfairly tied to a tax issue you didn’t cause, the relief process can help remove you from the responsibility.
Peace of Mind: Successfully claiming relief can bring emotional relief, especially if you’ve gone through a challenging marriage.
Potential drawbacks are:
No Guarantee of Approval: The IRS does not grant relief easily. You’ll need to provide strong evidence, and the process can be lengthy and difficult.
Time Limitations: You generally must apply for relief within two years of the IRS starting collection efforts. Missing this deadline could result in losing the opportunity for relief.
Invasive Process: The IRS will closely examine your financial and personal life, including details about your marriage and finances, which could feel intrusive if you value your privacy.
Possible Strain on Relationships: If you’re still married, filing for relief could cause tension, as it might be seen as blaming your spouse for the tax issue.
Conclusion
To request innocent spouse relief, you’ll need to file Form 8857. Be prepared to provide details about the tax years involved, explain why you didn’t know about the issue, and any supporting documents (like bank statements, emails, or divorce decrees.
After submitting the form, the IRS will notify your spouse or ex-spouse, who will have a chance to respond by a specific date.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Improving Federal Building Security Act of 2024 (S 3613) – The Federal Protective Service (FPS) contracts security guards to control access to government facilities and screen visitors to detect prohibited items, such as pepper spray and batons. Earlier this year, FPS investigators conducted a covert test at certain federal buildings in which the guards failed to detect prohibited items about 50 percent of the time. In response, Congress passed this bill requiring Facility Security Committees to respond to security recommendations issued by the FPS. It also mandates that the Homeland Security Department submit an unredacted report to Congress regarding FPS surveillance technology recommendations as well as summarize the FPS recommendations that buildings accepted or rejected. However, no additional funding for security is appropriated by the bill, which will sunset five years following enactment. The act was introduced on Jan. 18, 2024, by Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI). It passed in the Senate on March 23, the House on Dec. 10, and was signed into law on Dec. 17.
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025 (HR 5009) – This year’s version of the annual funding bill features a 14.5 percent increase in pay for junior enlisted servicemembers, as well as a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other personnel. The legislation also provides cost-of-living allowances per location, improved housing/barracks repair programs, more access to medical and mental health services, and increased employment support for military spouses. The legislation was introduced by Rep. David Joyce (R-OH) on July 27, 2023. This is a bipartisan bill that has passed in both the Senate and the House with various changes. It is currently awaiting signature by the White House for enactment.
Coastal Habitat Conservation Act of 2023 (HR 2950) – Introduced by Rep. Jared Huffman (D-CA) on April 7, 2023, this bill passed the House on Sept. 24, 2024, the Senate on Nov. 21, and was signed into law on Dec. 11. The legislation empowers the Coastal Program of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to increase efforts to assess, protect, restore and enhance key coastal environments that provide fish and wildlife habitats for certain federal trust species.
Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (S 4367) – This legislation was introduced by Sen. Thomas Carper (D-DE) on May 20, 2024. It passed in the Senate on Aug. 1 and in the House (with changes) on Dec. 10; the final bill is expected to be approved and signed into law by the end of the congressional session. This bipartisan bill is designed to improve the nation’s water resources infrastructure, including ports and harbors, inland waterway navigation, and flood and storm protection; it also strengthens our resilience during natural disasters. The legislation also institutes reforms at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in order to streamline processes and deploy projects faster.
SHIELD Against CCP Act (HR 9668) – Introduced on Sept. 18, 2024, by Rep. Dale Strong (R-AL), this bill would establish a task force working with the Department of Homeland Security. The group’s sole focus would be on countering terrorism, cybersecurity, and border/port security related to threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party. The legislation is in response to recent CCP activities such as stealing intellectual property and technology, threats to economic supply chain security and critical infrastructure, and surveillance activities targeting U.S. defense sites and even American citizens. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Dec. 10 and is currently in the Senate.
Increasing Baseline Updates Act (HR 9716) – In the first quarter of each year, the Congressional Budget Office provides Congress with an annual baseline 10-year projection of the budget and economy based on the fiscal impact of legislative proposals. Updates are released in Q2 and Q3 to reflect newly enacted laws and economic conditions. This bill would mandate that the executive branch provide critical data to the CBO by February 1 of each year to produce a more accurate annual budget baseline. The bill passed in the House on Dec. 11 and currently lies with the Senate. It was introduced by Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) on Sept. 20, 2024.
National Security
January 1, 2025 · Blog, Congress at Work
⏱ 4 min read
Improving Federal Building Security Act of 2024 (S 3613) – The Federal Protective Service (FPS) contracts security guards to control access to government facilities and screen visitors to detect prohibited items, such as pepper spray and batons. Earlier this year, FPS investigators conducted a covert test at certain federal buildings in which the guards failed to detect prohibited items about 50 percent of the time. In response, Congress passed this bill requiring Facility Security Committees to respond to security recommendations issued by the FPS. It also mandates that the Homeland Security Department submit an unredacted report to Congress regarding FPS surveillance technology recommendations as well as summarize the FPS recommendations that buildings accepted or rejected. However, no additional funding for security is appropriated by the bill, which will sunset five years following enactment. The act was introduced on Jan. 18, 2024, by Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI). It passed in the Senate on March 23, the House on Dec. 10, and was signed into law on Dec. 17.
Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025 (HR 5009) – This year’s version of the annual funding bill features a 14.5 percent increase in pay for junior enlisted servicemembers, as well as a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other personnel. The legislation also provides cost-of-living allowances per location, improved housing/barracks repair programs, more access to medical and mental health services, and increased employment support for military spouses. The legislation was introduced by Rep. David Joyce (R-OH) on July 27, 2023. This is a bipartisan bill that has passed in both the Senate and the House with various changes. It is currently awaiting signature by the White House for enactment.
Coastal Habitat Conservation Act of 2023 (HR 2950) – Introduced by Rep. Jared Huffman (D-CA) on April 7, 2023, this bill passed the House on Sept. 24, 2024, the Senate on Nov. 21, and was signed into law on Dec. 11. The legislation empowers the Coastal Program of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to increase efforts to assess, protect, restore and enhance key coastal environments that provide fish and wildlife habitats for certain federal trust species.
Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (S 4367) – This legislation was introduced by Sen. Thomas Carper (D-DE) on May 20, 2024. It passed in the Senate on Aug. 1 and in the House (with changes) on Dec. 10; the final bill is expected to be approved and signed into law by the end of the congressional session. This bipartisan bill is designed to improve the nation’s water resources infrastructure, including ports and harbors, inland waterway navigation, and flood and storm protection; it also strengthens our resilience during natural disasters. The legislation also institutes reforms at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in order to streamline processes and deploy projects faster.
SHIELD Against CCP Act (HR 9668) – Introduced on Sept. 18, 2024, by Rep. Dale Strong (R-AL), this bill would establish a task force working with the Department of Homeland Security. The group’s sole focus would be on countering terrorism, cybersecurity, and border/port security related to threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party. The legislation is in response to recent CCP activities such as stealing intellectual property and technology, threats to economic supply chain security and critical infrastructure, and surveillance activities targeting U.S. defense sites and even American citizens. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Dec. 10 and is currently in the Senate.
Increasing Baseline Updates Act (HR 9716) – In the first quarter of each year, the Congressional Budget Office provides Congress with an annual baseline 10-year projection of the budget and economy based on the fiscal impact of legislative proposals. Updates are released in Q2 and Q3 to reflect newly enacted laws and economic conditions. This bill would mandate that the executive branch provide critical data to the CBO by February 1 of each year to produce a more accurate annual budget baseline. The bill passed in the House on Dec. 11 and currently lies with the Senate. It was introduced by Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) on Sept. 20, 2024.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.